Attendees: Julia Brown, Dave Sohnchen, Jacquie Armstrong, Katie Ross

We discussed:

  • We are confident that if we charged $2 or less per engaged session, the bot would have an ROI for our partners.  The less we charge, the greater the ROI.
  • We ballparked that eventually, the bot should be covering around 250k/year
  • It would be great if the bot covered at least 100k in FY21
  • How much risk do we take on when charging per session?
  • Would our partners be willing to take on the risk of a fixed cost?
  • There are not any savings for already using GX for support.

After JA left, we discussed

  • The possibility of starting with (maybe two quarters) of price per session, and then agreeing on a fixed price per FQ going forward.
  • Julia recommends defining a session the same way competitors do.  I.e., if they are charging for every engaged session (no matter if it reaches a “helpful” intent or not), then so should we.  This allows us to have more of an apples-to-apples comparison in costs.  (Learn from GX mistakes with being too honest with price per hour.)

Next steps:

  • Determine more accurate numbers for “cost of bot”  -??Jacquie w/ Dave (and maybe Iris?)??
  • Have a pricing structure ready for DATG and MA by FY21 planning (Spring)

 Bot chargeback scratchpad 2020-02-10.xlsx


Attachments:

Bot chargeback scratchpad 2020-02-10.xlsx (application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet)